Tuesday, January 24, 2012

"The First Indo-Europeans" from Lilly to Dory

Hello, sister mine!

We've had a few conversations lately concerning the Indo-Europeans, so I'd like to share some of the things we've been discussing in class about them that you might find interesting.

But first, some overview for our readers who may not be familiar with the subject matter:

Almost all the modern European languages can be linked together linguistically, first into categorical branches, and then to a single historical common language, known as Proto-Indo-European.  Here's a diagram posted by Dory in one of our earlier posts (click for the post and a more in-depth description) that shows these connections:

It's called "Proto-Indo-European" because it's been reconstructed, based on ways of tracing the history of words (known as etymology) to find words in other languages which share a common historical root.  Because of this type of analysis, we know it has to have existed, but until recently relatively little was known about the people who actually spoke it.  However, you can tell quite a bit about a culture from its language!

First, we know through the archaeological record that the Indo-European culture originated in what is now Ukraine.  This is supported linguistically, as the modern Ukrainian language is the most similar to the reconstructed Indo-European language as compared to the other branches.

Here is where it starts getting cool, and why I love Anthro-linguistics...

We know the Indo-Euros were a pastoralist society, meaning their sustenance was based around herding some kind of animal (like sheep, cattle, goats, etc).  Typically, this "type," if you will, of culture will fall into certain patterns as far as its societal organization and spiritual beliefs.  In this case, the hierarchy follows thus: the shepherd watches over the flock as the father watches over his family (they tend to be male-dominated) as the leader watches over his tribe as a father-like deity watches over his people.  This is seen in many modern-day societies, and indeed can be spotted in the organization of Western culture and the terminology of modern Christianity (which stems from Judaism, which originated within a pastoralist group); "the good shepherd;" "sacrificial lamb;" "guide your flock;" etc.  The Indo-Euros are thought to have worshiped a god called "Sky Father," or "Diaus Pater" in it's reconstructed form, which is the root of words like "Dios" (Spanish), "Zues" (Greek), "Deu" (French), and "Dyw" (Cornish).

Now, the Indo-Euros weren't just ANY pastoralists.....

They were horse lords.

And, they had iron weapons before anyone else, making it easy for them to go around conquering all of their agrarian neighbors which is how their culture, language, and belief system spread across Europe so fast.  The blending of Indo-European and the languages of the groups they conquered is probably what kicked off the separate dialects that later evolved into the different language branches.

So, there is a certain mysterious culture that has been in Europe as long as anybody and whose language is very mysteriously indeed NOT a descendant of Proto-Indo-Euro.  They are the Basque.

My thoughts concerning this are largely centered on the idea that perhaps the ancient Basque were isolated enough to escape the notice of the conquering Indo-Euros, and so were able to keep their language where others were not.  What I'm wondering is, how did the ancient Basque live?  Were they agrarian, or were they perhaps nomadic?  This would link them to another European group who also speaks an independent language and managed to escape Indo-Euro influence: the Gypsies.

So, what are your thoughts?  Do you know something about the Basque or Gypsy cultures that would support this hypothesis, or am I completely off?

Love, Lilly

13 comments:

  1. I came dangerously close to suffocating from trying to stifle my laughter when I saw Khal Drogo there. Don't wanna wake up the roommates. :P

    Also, iiiiinteresting! I like the idea of the Basque and Gypsies escaping the notice of the Indo-European khalasars. I don't know much about Gypsies (except that they prefer the term "Roma" and that the legend puts their origin in India), but I know a bit about the Basque. At the moment, they live in a little cutout of land in the Pyrenees mountains between France and Spain.

    (here's a map: tinyurl.com/paysbasquemap)

    They also live on the coast, so if the Indo-Europeans were seafarers they probably wouldn't have escaped notice. But their habitation of the coast may very well be a recent development, and I can tell you from personal experience that the Pyrenees are crazy tall and steep and pretty well impossible to cross. Unless you're Basque, of course. Or have a car and roads.

    Basque Country is surrounded by Indo-European languages, which probably means that they were surrounded by Indo-Europeans, unless the people that settled in France, Spain, and Portugal showed up later. Their society at the moment is pretty agrarian/pastoral, and they're squished up in the Pyrenees farming on any land that will grow crops, no matter if it's the steep side of a hill (tinyurl.com/paysbasquefarm), and the land that isn't growing crops is grazing sheep. I'm guessing they've been largely the same for a long long time.

    My hypothesis works with yours, methinks. They are very isolated, and their culture has lived in a rather inhospitable place for a very long time. Their solid placement way up in the Pyrenees seems like some sort of fortification or hideout to escape, doesn't it? Might've been the horse lords. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hehe, I couldn't help the Dothraki reference! I can totally picture the Indo-Europeans having a city full of "stolen gods." And the idea of them being not so much one people, but a network of loosely connected tribes who share a common language and culture is the model for the Indo-Euros as well!

      I know they're mostly Catholic now, but I'd be interested to know what sort of religion the Basque practice historically. This would say a lot about their lifestyle and probably how they were able to avoid/escape the Indo-Europeans. I'm willing to guess they were either pastoralists themselves or even foragers, as either would cause them to move around a lot and be more difficult to trace. Not to mention, migratory people don't tend to have a bunch of the expensive and fancy stuff that makes sedentary societies so appealing to raiders.

      I totally agree that the Basque Country, with its natural defenses, looks like an intentionally chosen hideout. The horticultural practices employed by the Basque in modern times may have been an adaptation to becoming sedentary as a result of this need to hide away. It's interesting that they graze sheep here... it's possible that these sheep's ancestors were of the more mountain goaty type and were in this area prior to the people. They could have domesticated them themselves, and they would have been familiar with the herding lifestyle if they had been pastoralists before.

      Delete
    2. okay, I just looked up the handy-dandy Wikipedia page, and it looks like they were pantheistic. Like, the Maya-esque gods-as-personifications-of-natural forces kind of pantheistic. That makes them foragers, right? The article also briefly mentions "tribes," which may or may not mean they were nomadic.

      Delete
    3. Aha! Good work, Watson. Wikipedia, who knew?

      Soooo, pantheism COULD make them foragers (though they usually tend more toward animism -- the belief that all things posses a soul and a spirit... think Pocahontas). However, pantheism is kind of a step UP from animism, in that it can stem from it when seen in larger societies that have mixed and mingled with other groups and adopted everyone's beliefs as part of their own. Hinduism is an example of this. In the case of the Maya, though, it had more to do with them being an agricultural society pretty much right from the start. Water, rain, sunlight, wind, and everything else that was important to their sustenance took on a personification of its own and was ABOVE the people (hierarchy-wise), which is the main distinction between this system and animism.

      Gosh, that was a mouthful... I hope it made sense!

      Delete
    4. It made sense! So, in that case, it's likely that the Basque were agricultural, assuming that they follow the same pattern as the Maya? Either that, or they're a blend of cultures, which seems to me to be unlikely...does "blend of cultures" entail conquering, like the Romans' pantheism? In that case, back to linguistics, it would mean that the Basque language likely started out as a pidgin. Iiiinteresting. I dunno, though. It seems more plausible to me that they weren't a mix of cultures but rather a long-standing agricultural society. hm.

      Delete
    5. I agree, I think that makes more sense. And no, blending of cultures doesn't always imply conquering. It could result from trade or just plain ol' non-combative overlapping of borders.

      So, the scenario we have here is that the Basque were originally pantheistic agriculturalists (like many of the people the Indo-Euros conquered) but somehow were able to organize themselves into fleeing to a naturally defended territory where they adapted to a new lifestyle and where they remain today. Neato!

      Delete
    6. Neato indeed! :D

      Now, about the Gypsies....how did they get from India to wandering around Europe?

      Delete
    7. Hmmm, good question. I shall research this and get back to you.

      Delete
    8. Okay then, apparently I was misinformed about Gypsies. They speak several dialects of a Romani language, closely related to Hindi (as documented in 1763 by a Hungarian theology student) and obviously part of the Indo-Euro tree. This would confirm their Indian origins, though!

      Delete
    9. COOL!

      Ok, I have received new information that may contradict our Basque hypothesis. From what I understand from the dubiously clear writing of my linguistics textbook, the Western European Indo-European languages (Spanish, French, Portuguese) developed WAY later than I was supposing from my "Basque country is surrounded by I-E languages" idea. I sorta forgot that there's an intermediate branch of the family tree between I-E and French/Spanish/etc. The Italic branch--namely Latin. French and Spanish and all of them developed after the spread of the Roman Empire some 2000 or so years later than the Indo-Europeans were wandering around. So the Basque probably didn't get hedged in by I-Es, but maybe the Roman Empire did it? Dunno.

      ...did that make sense?

      Delete
    10. Oh! Actually, I knew that the "romance" languages were all dialects of the "vulgar Latin," as it was so called, but I was unclear on the timeline.

      Then yes, perhaps it was the Roman Empire! Though that still doesn't explain why they don't speak an I-E language. I think our hypotheses still stands.

      Delete
    11. I guess the answer about mixing with latin lies here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Basques#Roman_rule
      But there is still a big question mark on the origins and why they do not share common traits with Celtic languages for instance (the Celts also invaded Europe from the Shetlands to Gibraltar before the Romans did).

      Delete
  2. ALSO, Sky Father --> Deaus Pater --> Jupiter. Just remembered that one.

    ReplyDelete